MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412493324 · doi:10.5534/wjmh.250065

The Effects of Varicocele Repair on Testicular Sperm Retrieval, Sperm Recovery in the Ejaculate and Clinical Pregnancy Rates in Non-Obstructive Azoospermic Men with Clinical Varicocele: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4412493324 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe World Journal of Men s Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaricoceleMedicineTesticular sperm extractionSperm RetrievalIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionSpermAssisted reproductive technologyGynecologyPregnancy rateAzoospermiaMale infertilityInfertilityPregnancyAndrologyUrologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The role of varicocele repair (VR) in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and varicocele is controversial in the current guidelines, despite available studies. This study aims to assess the impact of VR on testicular sperm retrieval, sperm recovery from the ejaculate, and clinical pregnancy rates in infertile men with NOA and clinical varicocele through a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) of controlled studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the Scopus and PubMed databases up to November 2023. Among the 1,847 articles retrieved, five observational controlled studies comparing reproductive outcomes between infertile men with NOA and clinical varicocele who underwent VR, and a control group that received no treatment, met the inclusion criteria for this SRMA. RESULTS: The selected studies included 269 men with NOA who underwent VR before the testicular sperm extraction (TESE) procedure and 364 men who did not undergo VR. The pooled estimate demonstrated a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) of 2.17 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.17-4.01, p=0.01) for surgical sperm retrieval in the VR group. VR significantly increased the likelihood of sperm appearance in the ejaculate, with an OR of 7.8 (95% CI: 3.59-16.94, p<0.001). Besides, VR provided a significantly greater clinical pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) compared to non-operated men (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.03-4.60; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first SRMA, consisting of only controlled studies, to demonstrate that VR performed prior to TESE in men with NOA significantly improves sperm production as reflected in the spontaneous appearance of sperm in the semen and higher odds of surgical sperm retrieval and clinical pregnancy compared with non-operated men. Thus, these findings highlight the potentially beneficial impact of VR in men with NOA and clinical varicocele.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it