MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412495095 · doi:10.1177/10711007251351314

Assessing Risk to Articular Cartilage and the Calcaneofibular Ligament During Fibular Nailing: A Cadaveric Study

2025· article· en· W4412495095 on OpenAlexaff
Hirbod Abootalebi, William Paganini Mayer, Erin Bigney, Xiuming Shi, Madeline Power, Jacob Matz

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health NetworkCanada East Spine CentreSaint John Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCadaveric spasmIntramedullary rodAnterior talofibular ligamentAnkleSurgeryFixation (population genetics)CartilageFibulaAnatomyTibiaDeltoid ligamentPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Traditional surgical fixation of ankle fractures with plates and screws carries risks such as wound complications, hardware prominence, and soft tissue irritation. Intramedullary (IM) fibular nailing provides a minimally invasive alternative with potentially lower complication rates. Although prior studies have examined the risk posed by fibular nailing to the peroneal tendons and nerves, data remained limited regarding its impact on other adjacent structures especially the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and the articular cartilage of the distal fibula, structures whose injury could contribute to joint instability, persistent pain, or degenerative change. METHODS: This study assessed the risk and extent of damage to anatomical structures during IM nail fixation on 10 cadaveric lower extremities. Risks were categorized based on distances from the nail to the CFL, anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), sural nerve (SN), superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), peroneus longus, peroneus brevis (PB), and articular cartilage: high-risk (0-5 mm), moderate-risk (5.1-10 mm), or low-risk (>10 mm). RESULTS: Macroscopic evaluation identified the CFL, ATFL, and PB as high-risk structures. The CFL was damaged in 3 of 10 specimens, ranging from 14% to 64% of its width. The average distances to the CFL (1.20 mm), ATFL (3.43 mm), PB (3.19 mm), and articular cartilage (3.45 mm) fell in the high-risk range, although no significant damage was observed to the articular cartilage, ATFL, SN, or SPN. CONCLUSION: This study further confirms that IM fibular nailing is a generally safe and reliable option for treating ankle fractures. However, attention should be given to the potential for iatrogenic damage to high-risk soft-tissue structures, particularly the CFL and peroneal tendons. Although cartilage was always spared in this cadaveric study, its proximity warrants surgical caution. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings clarify the soft tissue risks associated with IM nailing and may provide guidance for orthopaedic surgeons and patient discussions, emphasizing the importance of proper technique to preserve soft tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle InternationalSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207