MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412495660 · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2025.138487

Liquid film thinning-thickening anomaly in electrolyte solutions

2025· article· en· W4412495660 on OpenAlexaff
Danlong Li, Rogério Manica, Jingqiao Li, Bailin Xiang, Hainan Wang, Qingxia Liu, Haijun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Colloid and Interface Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsThickeningThinningElectrolyteAnomaly (physics)Chemical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryChromatographyPhysicsPolymer scienceCondensed matter physicsPhysical chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HYPOTHESIS: The distribution of dissolved ions depends largely on the position and shape of air-water interfaces. Following the interfacial interaction, both the surface deformation and reduced separation distance may induce different ion concentrations in liquid film and bulk solutions. The consequent Marangoni effect should change the flow dynamics inside the liquid films and thus influence the film evolution process. EXPERIMENTS: In this study, a home-made interferometer is employed to obtain the spatiotemporal evolution of film profiles during the bubble-solid surface interaction. The quantification of film thickness enables the determination of micro/nanoscale fluid flow from liquid films. FINDINGS: Unlike the common cases of continuous film drainage behaviors, the film thickness at the rim exhibits a counterintuitive increase, causing the previously approaching bubble to retract from solid surfaces. It is revealed how the inward flow can surpass the drainage outflow and reverse the normal film evolution. Theoretical developments involving the electrolyte type, ion concentration and film deformation are provided to describe this competition and address the film thinning-thickening anomaly. Our finding enriches the understanding of the microscopic fluid flow in highly confined and deformed regions, and the research outcome creates the possibility of modulating near-wall bubble dynamics as required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Colloid and Interface ScienceSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207