MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effectiveness of Amaranth Grain Flatbread Compared to Maize Bread for Iron Deficiency Anemia among Pregnant Women: Findings from a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Southern Ethiopia

2025· preprint· en· W4412502637 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amanuel Yoseph, Lakew Mussie, Mehretu Belayneh, Francisco Guillén‐Grima, George Mutwiri, Jessica J. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed and Plant Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHawassa UniversityFondation Nestlé
KeywordsAmaranthAnemiaCluster (spacecraft)MedicineIron deficiencyIron-deficiency anemiaRandomized controlled trialEnvironmental healthAgronomyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Maternal anemia remains a critical public health issue in Ethiopia, with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) being the most prevalent form, primarily due to low dietary iron intake and poor bioavailability from cereal-based diets. Despite the widespread cultivation of nutrient-rich amaranth in Ethiopia, its role in improving maternal iron status remains understudied. To address this gap, we conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of amaranth grain flatbread consumption, compared to maize bread consumption, on hemoglobin concentration and IDA among pregnant women in southern Ethiopia. Methods: We conducted a six-month, community-based, parallel-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 306 pregnant women with anemia (mild or moderate) to evaluate the effectiveness of locally prepared amaranth grain flatbread in enhancing hemoglobin concentration and reducing IDA, compared to the standard maize bread. At the end of the intervention, hemoglobin levels were measured, and IDA was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) defined cutoffs of serum ferritin levels. Multilevel linear and modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted effects, accounting for confounders and community-level clustering. All analyses were conducted following the intention-to-treat principle. Results: The loss to follow-up rate was similar between the amaranth and maize groups (4.6% vs. 3.9%). In the unadjusted analysis, the mean hemoglobin concentration was higher in the amaranth group (12.39 g/dL, 95% CI: 12.17–12.61) compared to the maize group (10.17 g/dL, 95% CI: 9.95–10.39). The proportion of IDA was also lower in the amaranth group (26.71% [95% CI: 20.14–34.49] vs. 65.98% [95% CI: 57.93–73.21]). After adjusting for potential confounders (due to baseline differences after randomization) and clustering, pregnant women who received amaranth grain flatbread had higher hemoglobin levels (adjusted β = 2.67 g/dL; 95% CI: 2.41–2.90) and a 53% lower risk of IDA compared to those in the maize group (adjusted risk ratio = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.26–0.84). No serious adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusion: Consumption of amaranth grain flatbread during pregnancy improved hemoglobin levels and reduced IDA compared to maize-based diets. These findings highlight the potential of locally available, nutrient-dense foods, such as amaranth, to address maternal iron deficiency among pregnant women with mild or moderate anemia in resource-limited settings. Trial registration number: NCT06536153

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicSeed and Plant BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207