Assessing the Impact of Neuromuscular Taping on Thrombocyte Indices in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common complication among diabetic neuropathy patients, often associated with abnormalities in thrombocyte indices. This study aimed to assess the impact of neuromuscular taping (NMT) on thrombocyte indices in diabetic neuropathy patients with PAD. Methods: A total of 23 patients diagnosed with DN using the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Scoring System (TCNSS) and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE) were enrolled in the study. Participants underwent NMT decompression intervention sessions over a period of 24 days. Further, the genomic analysis utilized public databases derived from diabetes studies that investigated the development of diabetic neuropathy. Results: < 0.05). Additionally, there was a notable decrease in TCNSS and DNE scores post-intervention, indicating an improvement in DN symptoms. Moreover, genomic analysis identified 9 genes, including SLC30A1, TRBJ2-7, OLFM1, TCF7L2, MCF2L, CEP295NL, CEACAM22P, TSHZ2, and PDZD4, involved in DN development. Conclusion: These findings suggest that NMT holds promise as a therapeutic intervention for improving thrombocyte indices and managing DN symptoms in patients with PAD. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and long-term effects of NMT in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".