MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412507923 · doi:10.1002/aenm.202502153

Self‐Powered Mechanical Nanofluidic Generators Based on Gradient Charge‐Modified Sustainable Wood‐Derived Nanochannels

2025· article· en· W4412507923 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lizhen Chen, Jade Poisson, Yifei Zhan, Cheng Li, Minghao Zhang, Kai Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Energy Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship CouncilDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyCharge (physics)Nanofluidics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The growing demand for self‐powered technology in portable and wearable electronics has spurred significant advancements in energy harvesting systems. However, conventional mechanical generators based on triboelectric and piezoelectric effects are limited by short discharge durations, despite achieving high output potentials. Here, a mechanical nanofluidic generator (MNG) is reported with gradient charge‐modified nanochannels, designed for mechanical energy harvesting. The MNG features highly aligned nanochannels with engineered surface charges, enabling a peak output voltage of 10.58 ± 1.29 V and a prolonged energy release time of 675.80 ± 112.08 s, with orders of magnitude longer than traditional generators that normally discharge in milliseconds to microseconds. This superior performance is attributed to the synergistic effects of gradient surface charge modification and enhanced interactions between transport ions and surface charges. This performance is attributed to the synergistic effects of surface charge gradients and strengthened ion–surface interactions, underscoring the MNG's potential for next‐generation self‐powered systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Energy MaterialsSame topicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesFrench-language works237,207