MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412508114 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102133

The human cost of fast deliveries: A systematic literature review of occupational risks and safety outcomes in last-mile delivery workers

2025· article· en· W4412508114 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sergio A. Useche, Sergio Traficante, Javier Llamazares, Cristina Marín Palacios

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterio de UniversidadesFederación Española de Enfermedades RarasEuropean CommissionEuropean Regional Development FundMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsMileOccupational safety and healthBusinessMedicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth of the gig economy has transformed urban labor markets in the digitalization era, particularly in the last-mile delivery industry. Despite its expansion, the working conditions and occupational risks faced by ‘last-mile workers’ remain underexplored, with limited systematic evidence on their psychosocial, health, and safety challenges. Aim This study aims to systematically review empirical evidence on the occupational risks, psychosocial outcomes, and safety of last-mile delivery workers, focusing on how working conditions, delivery modalities, and road safety issues shape their health and well-being. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published until 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies and the CASP checklist for qualitative research. Results A total of 32 studies, covering a total of 38,682 last-mile workers, were included. Poor working conditions (e.g., economic insecurity, algorithmic control, time pressure) were consistently associated with negative psychosocial outcomes, including stress, fatigue, burnout, and reduced mental well-being. Motorized two-wheelers were found to have higher crash and injury risks than bicycles or light vehicles, primarily due to higher speeds and greater traffic exposure. Psychosocial stressors related to algorithmic management and piece-rate pay significantly influenced safety and health-related behaviors, linking high stress and workload to riskier riding/driving practices. Conclusion These findings highlight the need for multidimensional interventions targeting both the physical and psychosocial risks faced by last-mile workers, including safer work environments, occupational health initiatives, support for mental well-being, and more sustainable work practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.007
Bibliometrics0.0180.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport & HealthSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207