Repurposing proteomic nanoLC-MS platforms for untargeted metabolomics: evaluating DIA and polarity switching performance in human plasma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many of the advanced MS methods applied in proteomics such as nanoflow LC-MS with data-independent acquisition have yet to be verified and/or optimized on metabolomics applications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study evaluates the feasibility of repurposing a proteomics-optimized nanoLC-MS platform for untargeted metabolomics. Using NIST SRM 1950 reference human plasma, we compared the performance of polarity switching and separate polarity modes under DIA conditions, focusing on metabolite coverage, annotation, and response linearity. RESULTS: We observed, in the separate polarity and switching polarity runs 669 and 353 features in (+) mode and 558 and 446 features in (-) mode, respectively. A total of 233 metabolites were annotated using the (±) separate polarities and 179 using the (±) switching polarity based on MassBank of North America (MoNA) public MS library and filtered with the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB). Both switching and separate polarity methods performed well regarding response linearities which were investigated by spiking some amino acid compounds into plasma matrix. CONCLUSIONS: The polarity switching DIA approach for metabolomics reduced sample consumption and analysis time, but led to fewer detected features and annotations compared to separate polarity runs. These findings support the use of unified nanoLC-MS platforms for integrated multi-omics analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".