MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412510958 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-01392026mtgabs

(<i>Invited</i>) Rational Design of Efficient Electrocatalysts for Low-Cost, Sustainable Hydrogen Production and Fuel Cells

2025· article· en· W4412510958 on OpenAlexaff
Shuhui Sun, Huiyu Lei, Diane Rawach, Xiaohua Yang, Sixiang Liu, Pan Wang, Tingting Liu, Zonghua Pu, Jean‐Pol Dodelet, Gaixia Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen productionProduction (economics)Sustainable productionFuel cellsProduction costRational designHydrogen fuelHydrogenEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceNanotechnologyChemical engineeringChemistryEconomicsMechanical engineeringMicroeconomicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen fuel cells offer several advantages, including high efficiency, high energy density, and zero emissions, making them a key technology for a sustainable future. However, the widespread commercial adoption of fuel cells still faces significant challenges, primarily due to their high cost, which is largely attributed to the use of expensive platinum group metal (PGM) catalysts. In this talk, I will first briefly present our work on developing low-Pt catalysts, including various unique nanostructured Pt nanowires, nanotubes, and single atoms, to significantly enhance the activity and stability of Pt-based catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel cells. I will then focus on our efforts to develop inexpensive and highly active PGM-free catalysts (e.g., Fe/N/C) and hybrid catalysts, aimed at replacing rare and costly Pt-based catalysts in fuel cells. Finally, I will introduce our recent research on green hydrogen production, focusing on Pt single atom and non-precious metal catalysts for water splitting in acidic and alkaline media, respectively. References Liu, Z. Pu, G. Zhang, S. Sun, et al, Angewandte Chemie, 202414021 (2025). Liu, Z. Pu, G. Zhang, S. Sun, et al, SusMat, e246 (2024). Zhang, S. Sun, Nature Sustainability, 6, 729 (2023). P. Dodelet, G. Zhang, S. Sun et al, Energy Environmental Science, 14, 1034 (2021). Zhang, S. Sun, et al, Advanced Energy Materials, 10, 2000075 (2020). Zhang, S. Sun, J.P. Dodelet, et al, Energy Environmental Science, 12, 3015 (2019). Chenitz, G. Zhang, J.P.Dodelet, e. al, Energy Environmental Science, 11, 365 (2018). Zhang, S. Sun, J.P. Dodelet, et al, Nano Energy, 29, 111,125 (2016). Yang, G. Zhang, S. Sun, et al, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces., 12, 13739 (2020). Yang, G. Zhang, S. Sun, et al, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental., 264, 118523 (2020). Liu, Z. Pu, G. Zhang, S. Sun, et al, Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 521, 216145 (2024). Pu, G. Zhang, S. Sun, US Patent App. 18/312,672 (2023). Wang, G. Zhang, S. Sun, et al, Small, 18, 2105803 (2022). Wang, G. Zhang, S. Sun, et al, Nano-Micro Letters, 14, 1, 120 (2022). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→