MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412514240 · doi:10.1111/dom.16623

Improved glycemic regulation on exercise compared to non‐exercise days in a real‐world setting in individuals recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: A secondary analysis of the <scp>MOTIVATE T2D</scp> randomised controlled trial

2025· letter· en· W4412514240 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Löw J, Katie Hesketh, Kaja Falkenhain, Mary E. Jung, Joel Singer, Charlotte Jones, Catherine L. Russon, Robert Andrews, Matthew Cocks, Ali M. McManus, Jonathan P. Little

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Obesity and Metabolism · 2025
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineType 2 diabetesGlycemicPhysical therapyDiabetes mellitusPhysical medicine and rehabilitationEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Obesity and MetabolismSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207