Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Evaluation of Some 3d Metal Complexes with 2-Benzoylpyridine 4-Allylthiosemicarbazone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The eight new copper(II), nickel(II), zinc(II), and iron(III) coordination compounds [Cu(L)Cl]2 (1), [Cu(L)Br]2 (2), [Cu(L)(NO3)]2 (3), [Cu(phen)(L)]NO3 (4), [Ni(HL)2](NO3)2·H2O (5), [Ni(HL)2]Cl2 (6), [Zn(L)2]·0.125H2O (7), and [Fe(L)2]Cl (8), where HL stands for 2-benzoylpyridine 4-allylthiosemicarbazone, were synthesized and characterized. 1H, 13C NMR, and FTIR spectroscopies were used for characterization of the HL thiosemicarbazone. The elemental analysis, the FTIR spectroscopy, and the study of molar electrical conductivity were used for characterization of the coordination compounds 1–8. Also, the crystal structures of HL, its salts ([H2L]Cl; [H2L]NO3), and complexes 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 were determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Complexes 5, 7, 8 have mononuclear structures, while copper(II) complexes 1 and 3 have a dimeric structure with the sulfur atoms of the thiosemicarbazone ligand bridging two copper atoms together. Thiosemicarbazone HL and the complexes manifest antibacterial and antifungal activities. The studied substances are more active towards Gram-negative bacteria than towards Gram-positive bacteria and fungi. Complex 1 is the most active one towards Gram-positive bacteria and C. albicans, while the introduction of 1,10-phenanthroline into the inner sphere enhances the activity towards Gram-negative bacteria. Thiosemicarbazone and complexes 6 and 7 manifest antiradical activity that exceeds the activity of Trolox. HL and complex 1 manifest antiproliferative activity towards HL-60 cancer cells which exceeds the activity of their analogs with 2-formyl-/2-acetylpyridine 4-allylthiosemicarbazone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".