MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412520126 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555371

Six-year SPIRou monitoring of the young planet-host AU Mic

2025· article· en· W4412520126 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
J.-F. Donati, P. I. Cristofari, C. Moutou, Alexandrine L’Heureux, Neil J. Cook, E. Artigau, S. H. P. Alencar, E. Gaidos, A. A. Vidotto, P. Petit, A. Carmona, T. P. Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsPhysicsPlanetAstrophysicsHost (biology)AstronomyAstrobiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we revisit our spectropolarimetric and velocimetric analysis of the young M dwarf AU Mic based on data collected with SPIRou at the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope, over a monitoring period of 2041 days from 2019 to 2024. The longitudinal magnetic field, the small-scale magnetic field, and the differential temperature of AU Mic, derived from the unpolarized and circularly polarized spectra, were clearly modulated with the stellar rotation period, with a pattern that evolved over time. Magnetic modeling with Zeeman-Doppler imaging provides a consistent description of the global field of AU Mic. This model agrees not only with the least-squares deconvolved profiles of the circularly polarized and unpolarized spectral lines, but also with the small-scale field measurements derived from the broadening of spectral lines, for each of the 11 subsets of the full data. We find that the large-scale field is mostly poloidal, with a dominant dipole component slightly tilted to the rotation axis which decreased from 1.4 to 1.1 kG before increasing at the end of the campaign. The average small-scale field followed a similar trend, decreasing from 2.8 to 2.6 kG, then rising. The long-term magnetic evolution we report for AU Mic suggests that, if cyclic, the cycle period is significantly longer than 6 years. From velocimetric data, we derive improved mass estimates for the two transiting planets, with respective masses of M b = 6.3 −1.8 +2.5 M ⊕ and M c = 11.6 −2.7 +3.3 M ⊕ , yielding very contrasting densities of 0.32 −0.10 +0.13 and 2.9 −0.8 +1.1 g cm −3 and a new 90% confidence upper limit of 4.9 M ⊕ for candidate planet d (period 12.7 days), suspected to induce the transit-timing variations of b and c. We also confirm our claim that candidate planet e orbits AU Mic with a period of 33.11 ± 0.06 d, albeit with a smaller mass of M e = 21.1 −4.3 +5.4 M ⊕ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207