MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412520610 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095072

To what extent do cancer centres in Arab countries adhere to ASCO/ONS chemotherapy administration safety standards? A multicentre cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4412520610 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Rayan, Mo’men Sisan, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Ahmad Deeb, M Mansour Awad, Manal Hassan Baqeas

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersQatar National LibraryZarqa University
KeywordsMedicineAccreditationStaffingFamily medicinePatient safetyNursingHealth careMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which cancer centres in Arab countries adhere to the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society (ASCO/ONS) chemotherapy administration safety standards. DESIGN: Multicentre cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Sample of the largest cancer treatment facilities across 10 Arab countries, including governmental, private, university-affiliated and daycare centres where chemotherapy is administered. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals (including head nurses, oncologists, oncology pharmacists and quality staff) at each centre completed a structured survey on adherence to the ASCO/ONS chemotherapy administration safety standards. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of cancer centres fully implementing each of the 46 ASCO/ONS safety standards, grouped into four domains: (1) creating a safe environment-staffing and general policy; (2) treatment planning, patient consent and education; (3) ordering, preparing, dispensing and administering chemotherapy; and (4) monitoring after chemotherapy administration. RESULTS: Of the 25 centres invited, 19 (76%) participated. The domain most frequently fully implemented was treatment planning, patient consent and education (12/19 centres, 63.2%). The remaining domains were fully implemented by four centres or fewer. The lowest implementation was observed for standards requiring policies for documentation and follow-up of patients who miss or cancel scheduled visits or chemotherapy treatments. Centres accredited by the Joint Commission International and those that specifically reported adherence to internationally recognised oncology guidelines were more likely to fully implement specific domains of the ASCO/ONS chemotherapy administration safety standards. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gaps exist in the implementation of ASCO/ONS chemotherapy administration safety standards at cancer centres across Arab countries. These findings highlight opportunities for targeted interventions and policy development to improve chemotherapy safety in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.536
Teacher spread0.464 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic DrugsFrench-language works237,207