MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412520783 · doi:10.1177/17455057251347717

Impact of reduced institutional delivery coverage on neonatal survival during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal: Estimates using Lives Saved Tool model

2025· article· en· W4412520783 on OpenAlexaff
Dinesh Dharel, Deepak Paudel, Nazeem Muhajarine

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseMaternal healthCoronavirus2019-20 coronavirus outbreakEnvironmental healthDemographyVirologyInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)PopulationOutbreakHealth services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: An alarming observation from high-volume obstetric facilities in Nepal indicating a decreased institutional delivery rate and increased institutional neonatal mortality rate after the initial nationwide lockdown signaled the adverse population-level impact of the pandemic on the national trajectory of neonatal survival. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the impact of change in institutional delivery coverage on cause-specific neonatal mortality during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal. DESIGN: Modeling-based study. METHODS: We used the open-access Lives Saved Tool, based on a linear deterministic mathematical model validated for estimating cause-specific neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries, to estimate the number of additional neonatal lives saved and neonatal mortality rates. Using coverage change in institutional delivery rates as a proxy for interventions during childbirth, we compared the estimates using 'reported' coverage change during the pandemic with the 'targets' per Nepal Every Newborn Action Plan. RESULTS: The projected number of additional neonatal lives saved when the pandemic hit the hardest (Nepalese fiscal year 2020-2021) when national annual institutional delivery rate reportedly decreased was lower (104; 95% confidence interval: 69-148) compared to the target scenario (222; 95% confidence interval: 152-313). However, in the next year 2021-2022 when the institutional delivery rate increased, the number was higher (926; 95% confidence interval: 643-1295) compared to target scenario (329; 95% confidence interval: 226-466). The trajectory of the projected neonatal mortality rate per 1000 live births reversed (increased to 20.18) in 2020-2021 compared to 20.11 in 2019-2020 and then tracked down to 18.75 in 2021-2022. Most newborn lives would be saved from asphyxia, sepsis, and prematurity-related complications. Neonatal resuscitation, thermal protection, and cord care are the top three lifesaving interventions during childbirth. CONCLUSION: Neonatal survival in Nepal was adversely impacted during the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, with a favorable bounce back next year, based on the Lives Saved Tool projection per change in institutional delivery coverage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s HealthSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207