MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412520979 · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2025.103112

Major Depressive Disorder and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Children and Adolescents

2025· article· en· W4412520979 on OpenAlexafffund
Jessica Muha, Susan C. Campisi, Kimberley C. Tsujimoto, Sri Mahavir Agarwal, Alène Toulany, Chloe A. Hamza, Daphne J. Korczak

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian StudiesCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesMental Health Research CanadaPublic Health Ontario
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineDepression (economics)Major depressive disorderBody mass indexBlood pressureCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression ScaleRisk factorInternal medicineDiseasePsychiatryDepressive symptoms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) in youth is an independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). While previous research has considered individual CVD risk factors in relation to depression, this study examined the association between depression and CVD risk among children and adolescents with MDD using a validated composite measure. METHODS: Youth with MDD were recruited through an outpatient psychiatry program and underwent semistructured psychiatric diagnostic assessment to confirm diagnosis. Healthy control participants were recruited from community settings. All participants completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children to assess depressive symptoms. The continuous metabolic syndrome score, a validated measure for cardiometabolic risk assessment in youth, was computed using aggregated standardized z-scores of CVD risk factors, including fasting blood glucose, body mass index, blood pressure, fasting triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Hierarchical multiple regression models tested the association between depression (diagnosis and symptoms) and CVD risk while accounting for covariates. RESULTS: Participants (N=277; 73.6% female) had a mean age of 15.2 (SD=1.8) years. Cardiovascular disease risk was significantly higher among youth with depression (n=196, mean=0.77, SD=2.98) compared with healthy controls (n=81, mean=-0.39, SD=2.77; P=.002). Depression diagnosis and depressive symptoms were associated with increased CVD risk (β=0.40, P=.004; β=0.15, P=.02, respectively), after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with MDD demonstrate increased cardiovascular disease risk compared with healthy youth, highlighting early evidence of association between depression and cardiovascular disease. Consequently, childhood and adolescence may serve as crucial periods for preventive intervention targeting cardiovascular health among youth with depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAcademic PediatricsSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207