MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412520983 · doi:10.1186/s12885-025-14613-y

Ultrasound feature-based nomogram model for predicting extrathyroidal extension in papillary thyroid carcinoma

2025· article· en· W4412520983 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Guo, Chen Chen, Yin Zheng, Shifei Huang, Tianhan Zhou, Zhengxian Zhang, Lu Wang, Xu Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersScience and Technology Program of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNomogramSurgical oncologyMedicineUltrasoundThyroid carcinomaRadiologyFeature (linguistics)ThyroidOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The ultrasound diagnostic system for extrathyroidal extension (ETE) of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has not been thoroughly explored. To develop and validate a nomogram model based on ultrasound features to predict ETE of papillary thyroid carcinoma for preoperative assessment. METHODS: The training set retrospectively included 560 patients from two hospitals with preoperative ultrasound images showing capsule contact and confirmed as unifocal PTC by surgical pathology. The external validation set prospectively included 150 PTC patients with similar features and dynamic ultrasound videos. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of ETE in PTC, and an ETE nomogram prediction model was constructed to predict the risk of ETE in capsule-contacting PTC. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curves, and the clinical value of the model was determined through decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Among 710 capsule-contacting unifocal PTC patients, the incidence of ETE was 66.62% (473/710). Independent predictors of ETE were: Capsule bulging (OR = 8.951, 95%CI: 5.192–15.134), capsule contact angle ≥ 90° (OR = 2.331, 95%CI: 1.405–3.868), capsule contact extent ≥ 25% (OR = 5.708, 95%CI: 3.429–9.503), irregular morphology (OR = 1.856, 95%CI: 1.114–3.094), and coarse margins (OR = 4.198, 95%CI: 2.396–7.352). Based on these factors, an ETE nomogram diagnostic prediction model for PTC was established. The model’s ROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.887 (95% CI: 0.857–0.917), with diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.811, 0.799 and 0.807, respectively. The AUC of the external validation set was 0.896 (95% CI: 0.847–0.945), with diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.862, 0.762, and 0.820, respectively. The calibration curve showed good consistency between the predicted and actual probabilities of ETE. DCA showed that the model had good clinical application value. CONCLUSION: The ETE nomogram scoring prediction model based on conventional ultrasound features can provide a relatively convenient and intuitive preoperative quantitative assessment of ETE in PTC, serving as a reference for clinical decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC CancerSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207