MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412523151 · doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101191

Mycoplasma pneumoniae: re-emergence and beyond

2025· letter· en· W4412523151 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick M. Meyer Sauteur

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Microbe · 2025
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycoplasma pneumoniaeMicrobiologyVirologyBiologyMedicinePneumoniaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The re-emergence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in late 2023 placed a considerable burden on health-care systems and raised concerns regarding the severity of pneumonia outbreaks.1 The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Mycoplasma and Chlamydia Infections (ESGMAC) Mycoplasma pneumoniae surveillance (MAPS) study2 was able to attribute these outbreaks to M pneumoniae and found no statistically significant global increase in the proportion of severe outcomes compared with that of pre-pandemic epidemics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0240.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet MicrobeSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207