MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412528731 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1174

Mapping diffuse radio sources using TUNA: a transformer-based deep learning approach

2025· article· en· W4412528731 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nicoletta Sanvitale, C. Gheller, F. Vazza, A. Bonafede, V. Cuciti, E. De Rubeis, F. Govoni, M. Murgia, V. Vacca

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels
KeywordsPhysicsTunaTransformerAstronomyRemote sensingFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Vision transformers are used via a customized TransUNet architecture, which is a hybrid model combining transformers into a U-Net backbone, to achieve precise, automated, and fast segmentation of radio astronomy data affected by calibration and imaging artefacts, addressing the identification of faint, diffuse radio sources. Trained on mock radio observations from numerical simulations, the network is applied to the LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey data. It is then evaluated on key use cases, specifically megahaloes and bridges between galaxy clusters, to assess its performance in targeting sources at different resolutions and at the sensitivity limits of the telescope. The network is capable of detecting low surface brightness radio emission without manual source subtraction or re-imaging. The results demonstrate its groundbreaking capability to identify sources that typically require reprocessing at resolutions 4–6 times lower than that of the input image, accurately capturing their morphology and ensuring detection completeness. This approach represents a significant advancement in accelerating discovery within the large data sets generated by next-generation radio telescopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207