MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412533547 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.8.010

Investigating of the role of cybercrime and e-brand trust on purchase interest of e-commerce platforms

2025· article· en· W4412533547 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Fadil Imran, Hendra Gunawa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCybercrimeBusinessInternet privacyAdvertisingCommerceComputer scienceWorld Wide WebThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this digital era, the use of the Internet in business transactions through e-commerce platforms has created many conveniences, the development of Internet technology has given rise to crimes called cyber crime or crimes through the Internet network. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between cybercrime and purchase intention on e-commerce platforms, and the relationship between e-brand trust and purchase intention on e-commerce platforms. This research method is a quantitative method to analyze the relationship between variables, research data was obtained by distributing online questionnaires through social media platforms, and questionnaires containing statement items were designed using a Likert scale of 1 to 5. The respondents of this study were 535 consumers who had shopped online on e-commerce platforms determined by the simple random sampling method. Data analysis used the PLS Partial least squares SEM (PLS-SEM) technique. In the study, the outer model which is called the measurement model has a meaning between indicators connected by other variables. The measurement model of convergent validity, discriminant, and reliability was used. The standard loading factor value in the concurrent validity test must be > 0.7 or greater than the established criteria. The same applies to the discriminant validity test, which uses a larger value for the loading factor. The construct reliability test uses Cronbach's alpha and the composite reliability value. The hypothesis testing uses partial least square (PLS) which is the inner model test result, namely the R-square output, path coefficient, or t-statistic. The convincing t-statistic result > 1.96 is that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. If the probability number (p-value) <0.005 is included, then Ha is accepted. If the p-value is <0.05 (or 5%), the t-statistic is > 1.96, and the beta coefficient is positive, then Ha can also be accepted. The results of the analysis show that cybercrime has a positive effect on consumer purchasing intentions on e-commerce platforms and e-brand trust hurts consumer purchasing intentions on e-commerce platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesFrench-language works237,207