UTILE-Pore: Deep Learning-Enabled 3D Analysis of Porous Materials in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane-Based Energy Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3D imaging of porous materials in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM)-based devices, coupled with in situ diagnostics and advanced multi-scale modelling approaches, is pivotal to deciphering the interplay of mass transport phenomena, performance, and durability. The characterization of porous electrode media in PEM-based cells encompassing gas diffusion layers and catalyst layers often relies on traditional analytical techniques such as 2D scanning electron microscopy, followed by image processing such as Otsu thresholding and manual annotation. These methods lack the 3D context needed to capture the complex physical properties of porous electrode media, while also struggling to accurately and effectively discriminate porous and solid domains. To achieve an enhanced, automated segmentation of porous structures, we present a 3D deep learning-based approach trained on calibrated 3D micro-CT, focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy datasets, and data from physical porosity measurements. Our approach includes binary segmentation for porous layers and a multiclass segmentation method to distinguish the microporous layers from the gas diffusion layers. The presented analysis framework integrates functions for pore size distribution, porosity, permeability, and tortuosity simulation analyses from the resulting binary masks and enables quantitative correlation assessments. Segmentations achieved can be interactively visualized on-site in a 3D environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".