An Underwater Secure Localization Scheme Based on Physical Layer Cryptographic Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In open underwater environments, ensuring accurate positions of sensors while protecting private information of localization systems presents a significant challenge. The physical channel differences between terrestrial and underwater networks render most existing privacy protection schemes designed for terrestrial networks inapplicable underwater. Moreover, limited research on underwater privacy protection has led to high implementation complexity and communication expenses. In this paper, to reduce the complexity of privacy protection, a secure mobile localization scheme using autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) as anchors is proposed for underwater sensor networks, based on adversarial neural cryptography utilizing acoustic channel features. Depending on whether eavesdroppers show interest in keys, two adversarial cryptography models are proposed to protect transmission of legitimate localization information and to actively counter eavesdroppers with learning capabilities in real time. Furthermore, to obtain effective keys and minimize unnecessary key transmission, random physical layer channel features are dynamically utilized as real-time keys for the cryptography system, and a synchronous channel probing protocol is designed for key generation. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate that, compared to other approaches, the proposed secure localization scheme effectively prevents the leakage of position information and maintains localization accuracy while operating at lower implementation complexity and communication expenses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".