MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multidimensional Intrusion Detection System for Containerized Environments

2025· article· en· W4412537261 on OpenAlexaff
Reda Morsli, Nadjia Kara, Hakima Ould‐Slimane, Laaziz Lahlou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresÉcole de Technologie SupérieureInnovation and Economic Development Trois RivièresUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemComputer scienceIntrusion prevention systemIntrusionComputer securityGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are critical for securing modern networks and systems; however, traditional IDS approaches often rely solely on network traffic or host-level data, limiting their ability to detect sophisticated threats such as AI-driven, zero-day, and polymorphic attacks. This limitation is even more pronounced in highly dynamic environments, such as cloud-based and containerized architectures, where the potential of leveraging rich contextual information remains underexplored. To address this gap, we propose a novel Multidimensional Intrusion Detection System (MIDS) approach that integrates multiple data dimensions, including network and container features, to enhance threat detection in containerized environments. By combining these dimensions, MIDS provides a holistic view of the cluster, enabling more comprehensive threat analysis and improved detection accuracy. We introduce a new data merging technique that unifies network flows with container metrics to facilitate multidimensional analysis. Due to the lack of existing datasets containing such heterogeneous data, we generated two MIDS datasets by simulating prevalent attacks on two well-known containerized applications deployed on Kubernetes (K8s): one using the Damn Vulnerable Web Application (DVWA) and the other using Google's Bank of Anthos (BoA). These simulations included Denial of Service (DoS), brute force, and SQL injection attacks. We evaluated state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) algorithms on these datasets, including SVM, XGBoost, and DNN. The experimental results demonstrate that using MIDS enables ML algorithms to achieve up to 8.69 % and 30.07 % higher F1 scores compared to using only network or container data, respectively. Feature analysis highlights the complementary contributions of network and container dimensions, showcasing the effectiveness of the proposed multidimensional approach for intrusion detection in containerized environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207