Knowledge about childhood diarrhea among mothers: A systematic review of 2020 onwards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Childhood diarrhea is still a challenge in healthcare, and mother’s knowledge about it can play a vital role in its management. Recent reviews to assess mother’s knowledge may help in future strategies. Objective: To review the mother’s knowledge about the management of diarrhea. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using studies available free and in full on the internet and reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Statement (PRISMA) guidelines. All original studies that were freely available were included. Google Scholar was used for searching for relevant articles. BOOLEAN search criteria were tried using the AND and OR operations for specific terms. The data was entered in a Microsoft Excel document with the same heading as in the table. Results: A total of 15 studies were shortlisted and published from 2020 onwards. The Knowledge was very varying, ranging from 5.6% to 82.2% with statistical significance. Conclusion: The knowledge of mothers is quite varied about childhood diarrhea, even in recent literature. More studies should be done to find risk factors for such variation, and awareness campaigns should be given to increase knowledge among mothers, as they are the primary caregivers for their children. Keywords: Childhood diarrhea, knowledge, mothers, prevalence, management
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".