Anticipating Shifts in American Beech Distribution in a Changing Climate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aim This study aimed to anticipate shifts in habitat suitability for American beech ( Fagus grandifolia ) under current and future climate scenarios using an ensemble of species distribution models (SDM). The resulting habitat suitability projections will serve as a foundational layer for developing a hierarchical risk mapping model for beech leaf disease, an emerging epidemic in the eastern United States, which will be published in a subsequent paper. Location The study area spans the eastern United States—primarily east of the Mississippi River (Northeast, Midwest and Southeast)—and includes adjacent ecoregions of Canada where American beech occurs. Taxon The taxon of interest is American beech ( Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.), a keystone mesic species in eastern American forests. Methods We employed an ensemble species distribution modelling approach, combining generalised linear models, multivariate adaptive regression splines, generalised boosted models, random forest, and maximum entropy for R. Present‐day habitat suitability was modelled by bias‐corrected SDMs with target group background and spatial thinning via semi‐variogram measures, using a 1 km resolution dataset that included climatic, edaphic, and topographic variables. For projections under future scenarios, we utilised four shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), adopted from the AdaptWest database and modelled by employing ensemble means from eight Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 Atmosphere–Ocean General Circulation Models. Results Ensemble projections consistently show a decline in suitable habitat for Fagus grandifolia across all future climate scenarios, with losses outweighing gains. Winter precipitation emerged as the most influential variable (38.7%), followed by summer precipitation (15.2%), terrain ruggedness (11.4%), and extreme maximum temperatures (10.1%). Soil properties contributed moderately, with clay content, heat‐moisture index, pH and organic carbon accounting for the remainder. Main Conclusions American beech is projected to experience significant habitat contraction due to climate‐induced water stress and limited dispersal capacity. Conservation strategies should focus on protecting northern refugia, exploring assisted migration, and integrating climate suitability with emerging disease risks to enhance long‐term resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".