MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412552614 · doi:10.3390/rs17152538

Characterization of Fresh and Aged Smoke Particles Simultaneously Observed with an ACTRIS Multi-Wavelength Raman Lidar in Potenza, Italy

2025· article· en· W4412552614 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benedetto De Rosa, Aldo Amodeo, Giuseppe D’Amico, Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos, Marco Rosoldi, Igor Veselovskii, Francesco Cardellicchio, Alfredo Falconieri, Pilar Gumà-Claramunt, Teresa Laurita, Michail Mytilinaios, Christina–Anna Papanikolaou, Davide Amodio, Canio Colangelo, Paolo Di Girolamo, Ilaria Gandolfi, Aldo Giunta, E. Lapenna, Fabrizio Marra, Rosa Maria Petracca Altieri, Ermann Ripepi, Donato Summa, Michele Volini, Alberto Arienzo, Lucia Mona

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationEuropean Commission
KeywordsLidarSmokeWavelengthRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceCharacterization (materials science)MeteorologyMaterials scienceGeographyOptoelectronicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes a quite special and interesting atmospheric event characterized by the simultaneous presence of fresh and aged smoke layers. These peculiar conditions occurred on 16 July 2024 at the CNR-IMAA atmospheric observatory (CIAO) in Potenza (Italy), and represent an ideal case for the evaluation of the impact of aging and transport mechanisms on both the optical and microphysical properties of biomass burning aerosol. The fresh smoke was originated by a local wildfire about 2 km from the measurement site and observed about one hour after its ignition. The other smoke layer was due to a wide wildfire occurring in Canada that, according to backward trajectory analysis, traveled for about 5–6 days before reaching the observatory. Synergetic use of lidar, ceilometer, radar, and microwave radiometer measurements revealed that particles from the local wildfire, located at about 3 km a.s.l., acted as condensation nuclei for cloud formation as a result of high humidity concentrations at this altitude range. Optical characterization of the fresh smoke layer based on Raman lidar measurements provided lidar ratio (LR) values of 46 ± 4 sr and 34 ± 3 sr, at 355 and 532 nm, respectively. The particle linear depolarization ratio (PLDR) at 532 nm was 0.067 ± 0.002, while backscatter-related Ångström exponent (AEβ) values were 1.21 ± 0.03, 1.23 ± 0.03, and 1.22 ± 0.04 in the spectral ranges of 355–532 nm, 355–1064 nm and 532–1064 nm, respectively. Microphysical inversion caused by these intensive optical parameters indicates a low contribution of black carbon (BC) and, despite their small size, particles remained outside the ultrafine range. Moreover, a combined use of CIAO remote sensing and in situ instrumentation shows that the particle properties are affected by humidity variations, thus suggesting a marked particle hygroscopic behavior. In contrast, the smoke plume from the Canadian wildfire traveled at altitudes between 6 and 8 km a.s.l., remaining unaffected by local humidity. Absorption in this case was higher, and, as observed in other aged wildfires, the LR at 532 nm was larger than that at 355 nm. Specifically, the LR at 355 nm was 55 ± 2 sr, while at 532 nm it was 82 ± 3 sr. The AEβ values were 1.77 ± 0.13 and 1.41 ± 0.07 at 355–532 nm and 532–1064 nm, respectively and the PLDR at 532 nm was 0.040 ± 0.003. Microphysical analysis suggests the presence of larger, yet much more absorbent particles. This analysis indicates that both optical and microphysical properties of smoke can vary significantly depending on its origin, persistence, and transport in the atmosphere. These factors that must be carefully incorporated into future climate models, especially considering the frequent occurrences of fire events worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207