MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412565533 · doi:10.1088/2634-4386/adf2d4

End-to-end neuromorphic speech enhancement with PDM microphones <sup>*</sup>

2025· article· en· W4412565533 on OpenAlexaff
Sidi Yaya Arnaud Yarga, Sean U. N. Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromorphic Computing and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringSpeech enhancementComputer scienceEnd-to-end principleSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Enhancing speech in noisy environments is essential for applications like automatic speech recognition, hearing aids, and real-time voice interfaces, but remains challenging on low-power, always-on edge devices. Conventional systems rely on pulse code modulation (PCM) signals and artificial neural networks, both of which introduce significant preprocessing and computational overhead. In this work, we present PDMDNS, a novel end-to-end neuromorphic framework for real-time speech denoising that directly processes binary pulse density modulation (PDM) microphone output using a spiking neural network, entirely bypassing the conventional PDM-to-PCM conversion and preprocessing stages. PDMDNS simultaneously performs speech enhancement and signal format conversion, leveraging stateless spiking neurons to reduce computational cost while maintaining temporal modeling capabilities. Moreover, when evaluated on a dataset containing noisy signals with SNRs ranging from 20 dB to −5 dB, our system achieves an average improvement of +7 dB in SI-SNR and a +3% gain in STOI. Although this performance is slightly below the current state-of-the-art by less than 1 dB, PDMDNS requires only 33 M-Ops/s, which is nearly 3× fewer operations than the best-performing spiking models. While PDM signals require a trade-off between maximizing precision through high sampling rates and minimizing energy consumption with lower rates, PDMDNS demonstrates robust generalization across varying input sampling rates (−12.5% to +37.5%) without the need for retraining. This flexibility makes it a compelling solution for energy-efficient, low-latency speech processing in embedded and neuromorphic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuromorphic Computing and EngineeringSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207