Mechanically Active and Antimicrobial Wound Closure Using an Adhesive Hydrogel-Elastomer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic wounds affect millions worldwide and lead to pain, infection, and impaired quality of life. Current wound sealing technologies for chronic wound care remain largely palliative, with poor adhesion, weak mechanical properties, and limited ability to deliver therapeutics. Emerging technologies, including autologous blood products, growth factor-enhanced scaffolds, and artificial skin, although clinically successful, are limited from widespread adoption by the high cost of production and challenging clinical workflow. Here, we present a tough adhesive-elastomer wound care technology that is mechanically robust to approximate wound edges, can adhere strongly to wet and dynamic wound surfaces, is capable of delivering antimicrobials, and supports cell migration and proliferation. This technology has the potential to address an unmet clinical need in wound healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it