Intraoperative Hypotension and Major Adverse Cardiac Events Among Older Adult Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is an important risk factor for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, the IOH threshold in older adult patients remains controversial. Objective: This study aimed to explore an appropriate IOH threshold in older adult patients to decrease the risk of MACE. Methods: This study involved older adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery (age ≥65 y) from January 2012 to August 2019 in the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital (PLAGH; 35,262 patients) and Shanghai Changhai Hospital from January 2024 to December 2024 (13,418 patients). Univariate moving-average plots and multivariate restricted cubic splines were used to determine the IOH thresholds associated with an increased risk of MACE. The relationship between the IOH threshold and MACE was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses by 3 different hypotension exposure forms (duration, area, and time-weighted average mean arterial pressure [MAP]). Results: Out of 35,262 patients, 874 developed MACE in PLAGH, and 296 of 13,418 patients developed MACE in Changhai Hospital. In PLAGH, MAP below an absolute threshold of 70 mm Hg was associated with MACE. When the IOH absolute threshold was 70 mm Hg, the risk of MACE demonstrated a "dose-increasing" effect with changes in IOH exposure, and the risk of MACE was significantly increased when the duration lasted >15 minutes (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.88; P<.001). The stratified analysis showed that in patients younger than 80 years, when intraoperative MAP dropped below 70 mm Hg for more than 15 minutes, the odds ratio was 1.38 (95% CI 0.86-2.28), P<.01. In Changhai hospital, intraoperative MAP <70 mm Hg was also significantly associated with MACE. Furthermore, IOH lasting longer than 15 minutes substantially increased the risk of MACE. Conclusions: For older adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, intraoperative MAP should be kept above 70 mm Hg to reduce the risk of postoperative MACE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".