MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412571399 · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05575-8

A high-resolution database of historical and future climate for Africa developed with deep neural networks

2025· article· en· W4412571399 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Namiiro, Andreas Hamann, Tongli Wang, Dante Castellanos‐Acuña, Colin Mahony

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British ColumbiaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsDownscalingClimate modelOrographic liftClimate changeComputer scienceDatabasePrecipitationClimatologyGridArtificial neural networkMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceData miningRemote sensingGeographyMachine learningGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study contributes an accessible, comprehensive database of interpolated climate data for Africa that includes monthly, annual, decadal, and 30-year normal climate data for the last 120 years (1901 to present) as well as multi-model CMIP6 climate change projections for the 21 st century. The database includes variables relevant for ecological research and infrastructure planning, and it comprises more than 25,000 climate grids that can be queried with a provided ClimateAF software package. In addition, 30 arcsecond (~1 km) resolution gridded data are available for download. The climate grids were developed with a three-step approach, using thin-plate spline interpolations of weather station data as a first approximation. Subsequently, a novel deep learning approach is used to model orographic precipitation, rain shadows, lake and coastal effects at moderate resolution. Lastly, lapse-rate based downscaling is applied to generate high-resolution grids. The climate estimates were optimized and cross-validated with a checkerboard approach to ensure that training data was spatially distanced from validation data. We conclude with a discussion of applications and limitations of this database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207