How Does Energy Harvesting from a Fluttering Foil Influence Its Nonlinear Dynamics?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the nonlinear aeroelastic behavior and energy harvesting performance of a two-degrees-of-freedom NACA 0012 airfoil under varying reduced velocities and electrical load resistances. The system exhibits a range of dynamic responses, including periodic and chaotic states, governed by strong fluid–structure interactions. Nonlinear oscillations first appear near the critical reduced velocity Ur*=6, with large-amplitude limit-cycle oscillations emerging around Ur*=8 in the absence of the electrical loading. As the load resistance increases, this transition shifts to higher Ur*, reflecting the damping effect of the electrical load. Fourier spectra reveal the presence of odd and even superharmonics in the lift coefficient, indicating nonlinearities induced by fluid–structure coupling, which diminishes at higher resistances. Phase portraits and Poincaré maps capture transitions across dynamical regimes, from periodic to chaotic behavior, particularly at a low resistance. The voltage output correlates with variations in the lift force, reaching its maximum at an intermediate resistance before declining due to a suppressing nonlinearity. Flow visualizations identify various vortex shedding patterns, including single (S), paired (P), triplet (T), multiple-pair (mP) and pair with single (P + S) that weaken at higher resistances and reduced velocities. The results demonstrate that nonlinearity plays a critical role in efficient voltage generation but remains effective only within specific parameter ranges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".