MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412578204 · doi:10.17483/wq6drn68

Exploring the Influence of Clinical Externships on Newly Graduated Nurses’ Transition to Practice

2025· article· en· W4412578204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransition (genetics)Clinical PracticePsychologyMedical educationNursingMedicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: In 2021, the Ontario government began funding clinical externships to help hospitals faced with significant human health resource issues during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical externships provide students an opportunity to work alongside nurses as unregulated health care workers in hospitals. Limited research is available related to clinical externship programs in Ontario, with most research focusing on programs in the United States, measuring retention, and studying how students felt during or immediately after the completion of the programs. The aim of this study was to explore how newly graduated nurses (NGNs) felt their participation in a clinical externship program influenced their transition from student to nurse. Methods: This study used interpretive description as its research methodology. Exploring associations, relationships, and patterns within a phenomenon while borrowing elements from the more traditional qualitative techniques, interpretive description was chosen to generate an understanding of participant experiences that would be relevant and useful to clinical practice. Using social media and purposive sampling, nurses in their first year of practice who worked as a clinical extern while in nursing school were recruited to participate. Eight NGNs completed interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data analysis used a constant comparative approach. Results: Three main themes emerged: developing self-efficacy, developing a professional identity, and being on the inside. Clinical externships gave participants exposure to the clinical setting over and above those offered by clinical placements and consolidations in the nursing program. This exposure provided participants the opportunity to develop self-efficacy in skills, assessments, and communication; start to develop a sense of themselves as nursing professionals; and gain an insider glimpse into the realities of nursing. Conclusion: This study contributes to the knowledge of how clinical externships may influence the transition to practice of NGNs in Ontario and has several implications for various relevant groups. Nursing educators must advocate for adequate clinical exposure and hands-on experiences, integrating more experiential learning opportunities into nursing curriculum. Researchers, policy makers, and practice leaders must also collaborate to evaluate externship programs to help inform continued programs and opportunities for improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it