MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412584010 · doi:10.1002/ar.70023

Recovery of novel osteological specimens ( <i>Mammuthus</i> ) from the Mammoth Site of Hot Springs, South Dakota, <scp>USA</scp>

2025· article· en· W4412584010 on OpenAlexaff
A C GARDNER, Christopher N. Jass, John R. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Anatomical Record · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alberta Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMammothOsteologyArchaeologyPleistoceneGeographyExtant taxonGeologyFeatherPaleontologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mammoth Site of Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA, is a Pleistocene locality best known for its Columbian mammoth (Mammuthus columbi) remains which were trapped, buried, and preserved in a sinkhole more than 130,000 years ago. Over the past 50 years, more than 5000 specimens have been excavated, many of which remain in situ. In the summers of 2023 and 2024, two unique specimens were excavated from the bonebed: a segment of "predigit" (an ossified, formerly cartilaginous rod of the fat pad), likely a distal prehallux, and a fused proximal sesamoid pair from the digits. Despite both phenomena being well documented in extant elephants, we report the first record of those elements, to our knowledge, in extinct elephants. This finding supports the prediction that "predigit" sesamoids are ancestral for crown group elephants, reflecting the ancient nature of the singular form and function of the feet in proboscideans, related to supporting these giant animals on land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Anatomical RecordSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207