MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412584041 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7150794/v1

Provider's and stakeholders' experiences with and perceptions of the benefits and challenges of delivering care for noncommunicable diseases within HIV care services in Rwanda

2025· preprint· en· W4412584041 on OpenAlexaff
Valentine Dushimiyimana, Ladislas Nshimiyimana, Yvonne Delphine Nsaba Uwera, Vivianne Niyonkuru Umuhire, Brenda Asiimwe‐Kateera, Prosper Karame, Jef Vanhamel, Marie Fidele Muremba, Pacifique Mukashema, Léopold Bitunguhari, Jean Claude Semuto Ngabonziza, Clarisse Musanabaganwa, Eric Remera, Madéleine Durand, Marc Twagirumukiza, Ntobeko Ntusi, Geert Van Hove, Steven Callens

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Commission for Science and Technology
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PerceptionNursingBusinessMedicinePsychologyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk→French-language works237,207→