MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412585358 · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2025.07.035

Semi-tensor product-based fuzzy relation matrix technique for gear system state forecasting

2025· article· en· W4412585358 on OpenAlexafffund
Hong L. Lyu, Wilson Wang, Xiao P. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueISA Transactions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRelation (database)Tensor productMatrix product stateComputer scienceFuzzy logicTensor (intrinsic definition)Matrix (chemical analysis)State (computer science)Product (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceMatrix multiplicationMathematicsData miningAlgorithmPhysicsMaterials scienceGeometryPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple-variable fuzzy prediction systems are usually difficult for modeling due to their complicated fuzzy reasoning structures and propositions. To tackle this challenge, a hierarchical fuzzy state modeling technique is proposed in this work to construct fuzzy relation matrices (FRM) with reduced dimensions (orders), for system state forecasting. In processing, firstly, the FRM with high dimensions is decomposed into several lower-dimensional FRM models. Secondly, using the semi-tensor product, a fuzzy logic framework is developed to reduce the number of fuzzy rules. The proposed hierarchical fuzzy model is also implemented for gear system health state forecasting, where system parameters are trained to improve the fuzzy reasoning accuracy. The effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical FRM modeling and system identification techniques is verified by experimental tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISA TransactionsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207