MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analisis Pola Asuh Permisif dalam Perkembangan Sosial Emosional Anak Era Digital di Kober Al-Amin

2025· article· en· W4412585781 on OpenAlex
Ila Mustakimah, Imas Masitoh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEdu Happiness Jurnal Ilmiah Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini  · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsArbutus Biopharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyArtPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to analyze permissive parenting in the social emotional development of children in the digital era at Kober Al-Amin. This research uses a qualitative approach with phenomenological method. Data collection techniques were conducted through interviews, observations, complete open and directed discussions, and documentation studies. The results showed that there are two impacts of permissive parenting. The positive impact of this parenting is that children are independent, have good creativity, have a high level of imagination because there is no benchmark from parents or educators and then poured into their lives. While the negative impact in permissive parenting that we found is that if parents do not supervise children, it is feared that children will behave badly because of lack of parental supervision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it