MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412595738 · doi:10.1121/10.0037195

Robust regularized blind system identification with application to adaptive speech dereverberation

2025· article· en· W4412595738 on OpenAlexaff
Hongsen He, Jingdong Chen, Jacob Benesty, Yi Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersSichuan Province Science and Technology Support ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceImpulse responseInverse filterRegularization (linguistics)MicrophoneAlgorithmFinite impulse responseSpeech recognitionRobustness (evolution)Adaptive filterLeast mean squares filterSpeech enhancementInverseMathematicsNoise reductionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The normalized multichannel frequency-domain least-mean square (NMCFLMS) algorithm is a prominent method for blind identification of multichannel acoustic systems. However, the NMCFLMS algorithm relies on a constant, determined by a block of microphone signals, to define the regularization parameter. This setup makes the algorithm sensitive to variations in speech segments and noise conditions. In this paper, we propose a variable regularization parameter that incorporates key factors, such as signal-to-noise ratio, output signal power, and filter length, to enhance the robustness of the algorithm against additive noise and the non-stationary nature of speech. Additionally, we introduce a mechanism to update the regularization parameter based on the mean-squared error of the adaptive filter, improving the ability of the algorithm to track time-varying systems. The proposed variable regularization NMCFLMS algorithm is then applied to speech dereverberation using the multichannel input-output inverse theorem method. Simulation results, using room impulse responses measured in real acoustic environments, demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in both multichannel blind identification and speech dereverberation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207