Liberational Historical and Philosophical Arc to Queer Liberation Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Queer liberation is a concept that is derived from the tenets and principles of the gay liberation movement of the late 1960s and early ‘70s. The notion of liberation has a much longer history and is premised on a number of philosophical perspectives, including slavery abolition in Africa, the repression of Indigenous culture, and the extensive struggle of liberation movements in South America. Historical and philosophical trajectories speak to the evolution of liberationist discourse, just as there has been an evolving of gay liberation to queer liberation socially, politically, and culturally. What historical and philosophical perspectives have informed gay liberation and continue to inform queer liberation as part of the latter’s theorization is examined. Given that the 2SLGBTQI+ communities have identified themselves and organized as movements in some parts of the world and thrived as internally supportive communities in more repressive parts of the world in the pursuit of liberation based on their gender and sexual diversity, historical and philosophical underpinnings of this pursuit are pertinent in the development of queer liberation theory. Ultimately, an arc is created that links historical and philosophical liberationist pursuits to those of the gender and sexually diverse involving the decolonialization of heterosexism and cis-genderism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.064 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".