MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412597990 · doi:10.1007/s10461-026-05132-3

Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Association between Sleep and HIV Prevention and Care Behaviors Among Transgender Women of Color: The TURNNT Cohort Study

2025· preprint· en· W4412597990 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dustin T. Duncan, Alexander Furuya, Asa Radix, Adam Whalen, Jenesis Merriman, Denton Callander, Nour Makarem

Bibliographic record

VenueAIDS and Behavior · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesSchool of Medicine, New York UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityYork UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNorthwestern University
KeywordsCross-sectional studyTransgenderAssociation (psychology)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)CohortMedicineCohort studyGerontologyLongitudinal studyTransgender womenSleep (system call)PsychologyClinical psychologyDemographyPsychiatryMen who have sex with menFamily medicineSociologyInternal medicinePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Transgender women of color have shorter and worse-quality sleep, putting them at risk for worse health outcomes. We investigated the causal effect of sleep on HIV care and prevention outcomes among transgender women of color.Methods: We used data from transgender women of color living in New York City from the Trying to Understand Relationships, Network and Neighborhoods Among Transgender Women of Color (TURNNT) Cohort Study. Our exposures of interest were short sleep (sleeping for less than seven hours per night), poor-quality sleep (self-rated quality of sleep as “very bad” or “fairly bad”), and sleep onset latency (taking at least 30 minutes to fall asleep). We asked participants about their HIV care and prevention outcomes, including HIV/STI testing, condom use, PrEP use, and HIV viral load suppression. We used Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) to estimate the causal relative risk (RR) of sleep on these outcomes and included age, education, income, US-born nativity, and hormone replacement therapy use as potential confounders.Findings: Among the 314 participants, 54·5% had short sleep, 35·0% had poor-quality sleep, and 55·4% experienced sleep onset latency. Worse sleep health had positive and negative effects on HIV outcomes. Among people living with HIV (46·2%), those who had short amounts of sleep were less likely to always use a condom (RR 0·67, 95% CI 0·51–0·87]), and those who had poor-quality sleep were less likely to be virally suppressed (0·83, 0·72–0·96]). However, sleep onset latency was positively predictive of STI testing (1·19, 1·03–1·37]). Among people not living with HIV (51·6%), experiencing sleep onset latency decreased the likelihood of always condom use (0·46, 0·28–0·74).Interpretation: Improving sleep health among transgender women of color could improve HIV care and prevention outcomes and reduce health inequities. More research is needed to understand how sleep health affects HIV care and prevention outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIDS and BehaviorSame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207