MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RHBD current-mode bandgap with SET isolation using PVT-independent sensors

2025· article· en· W4412603908 on OpenAlexafffund
Jaime Cardenas Chavez, Ming Yan, Tejinder Singh Sandhu, Adriana Noguera Cundar, Kamal El‐Sankary, Li Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroelectronics Reliability · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIsolation (microbiology)Set (abstract data type)OptoelectronicsCurrent (fluid)Mode (computer interface)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This manuscript introduces a single event transient (SET) detecting circuit which is used in a current- mode bandgap reference circuit to reduce the magnitude of SET-induced voltage pulses at the bandgap output. Switches controlled by the SET detectors are inserted between the bandgap and output. When either a positive or negative voltage transient is detected at bandgap, one of the switches will be turned off to temporarily isolate the bandgap circuit from the output, thus preventing the SET glitches from propagating to the load devices. A capacitor at the output was used to keep the output voltage stable in case of an SET. Once the collected charge is dissipated and the bandgap reference circuit resumes normal operation, the switches will be turned on so that normal reference voltage will be reconnected to the output. This proposed structure was fabricated in a 28-nm FDSOI technology. Simulated results revealed a significant reduction in the SET magnitude. These results were also validated experimentally by using a 105 MeV proton radiation facility, and the SET magnitude at the bandgap reference output can be limited to 10 mV. The implemented SET detector is a versatile structure that can be applicable to DC circuits including LDOs, DC-DC converters and other types of bandgap reference circuits, enhancing their reliability when operating in high radiation environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroelectronics ReliabilitySame topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207