Gedung Pusat Pelayanan Keselamatan Terpadu Di Kota Palu Dengan Pendekatan Konsep Bentuk Yang Respon Terhadap Bencana Gempa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the effectiveness and smoothness in handling disasters and emergencies in the city of Palu, it is deemed necessary to have a Public Safety Center building that will facilitate disaster mitigation activities and serve as a first aid station in emergencies caused by disasters and accidents. According to the Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016, the Public Safety Center (PSC) is a service center that guarantees the community's needs in matters related to emergencies within the district/city. Furthermore, because this building serves as a safety center, the design will incorporate a form concept approach that responds to earthquake disasters. This research is a study that uses the architectural design method. The architectural design method is a design process that will produce a design based on data collected beforehand, where the data is highly relevant to the research. The data were obtained through interviews, surveys, and field observations. The design concept of the building form for the Integrated Safety Service Center was created with a basic square shape. This shape was chosen with the consideration of aligning with the building's function, thereby facilitating users in carrying out their activities. Additionally, this shape is also deemed to ease its arrangement on the planning site. Because, as is known, the square shape has a character that is easy and efficient in its arrangement. Moreover, if we refer to the regulations of the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) regarding earthquake-resistant building shape standards, the basic shape of the Integrated Safety Service Center building as the design object is in accordance with the earthquake-resistant building floor plan shape standard, which is a square-shaped floor plan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".