Small area estimation of growing stock timber volume, basal area, mean stem diameter, and stem density for mountain forests in Austria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regression models were evaluated to estimate stand-level growing stock timber volume (GSV), quadratic mean diameter (QMD), basal area (BA), and stem density (N) in the Brixen im Thale forest district of Austria. Field measurements for GSV, QMD, and BA were collected on 146 inventory plots using a handheld mobile personal laser scanning system. Predictor variables were derived from airborne laser scanning-derived normalized digital surface and terrain models. The objective was to generate stand-level estimates and associated uncertainty for GSV, QMD, BA, and N across 824 stands. A unit-level small area estimation framework was used to generate stand-level posterior predictive distributions by aggregating predictions from finer spatial scales. Both univariate and multivariate models, with and without spatially varying intercepts, were considered. Predictive performance was assessed via spatially blocked cross-validation, focusing on bias, accuracy, and precision. Despite exploratory analysis suggesting advantages of complex multivariate spatial models, simpler univariate spatial—and in some cases, nonspatial—models exhibited comparable predictive performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".