Digital Transformation of Construction Projects with an Advanced Agile Tool for Deformation Risk Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Agile Monitoring Tool (AMT), integrated within the Smart Infinity Dimensions (S∞D) modeling platform as part of the Digital Transformation Project Management Platform, enhances safety and efficiency in large-scale construction projects by combining agile risk management with structural health monitoring (SHM). Traditional SHM systems monitor structural changes but often lack agile risk management, safety measures, and preventative safety alert functions. AMT addresses this gap by embedding agile risk management and real-time alerts, notifying key stakeholders to support informed decision-making. Through a five-stage process—identifying risks, notifying stakeholders, coordinating teams, allocating resources, and managing data—the AMT provides construction teams with actionable insights, potentially preventing up to 70% of onsite accidents by addressing risks proactively. While pilot testing indicates substantial accident prevention capabilities, further validation across diverse construction projects is necessary. Developed from six Calgary-based projects, the AMT leverages IoT-enabled Real-Time Monitoring and 3D modeling within the S∞D platform to monitor and optimize resource allocation, reduce energy consumption, and minimize waste and rework costs. Pilot testing highlights AMT’s effectiveness as a scalable, cost-efficient tool for high-stakes construction projects requiring rigorous safety management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it