MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412615143 · doi:10.15690/pf.v22i3.2913

Vaccination of a Patient with Rett Syndrome: Case Report

2025· article· en· W4412615143 on OpenAlexaff
Tatiana A. Kaliuzhnaia, Мarina V. Fedoseenko, Nato D. Vashakmadze, Natalia V. Zhurkova, Firuza Ch. Shakhtakhtinskaya, Svetlana V. Tolstova, Arevaluis M. Selvyan, Ludmila K. Mikhaylova, Leonid M. Yatsyk, Svetlana G. Gubanova, Svetlana E. Kondratova

Bibliographic record

VenueПедиатрическая фармакология · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRett syndromeVaccinationMedicinePediatricsVirologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rett syndrome is a rare hereditary disease that is one of the most common causes of intellectual disability in girls. The disease manifests itself in 6–18 months of life. Common symptoms of Rett syndrome include progressive mental and speech development delay, regression of previously acquired speech and motor skills, respiratory disorders, epilepsy, pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, endocrine, cardiovascular and urinary systems, which significantly impairs the vital functions of patients. Many children with this disease receive preventive vaccinations behind schedule or are not vaccinated at all, which is due to both refusals from parents and unjustified medical challenges from specialized specialists. The article presents a case report of a 5-year-old girl with Rett syndrome who was vaccinated later than the date indicated in the national calendar of preventive vaccinations of the Russian Federation and did not have all the necessary preventive vaccinations for her age. By contacting the Pediatrics and Child Health Research Institute in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery the patient was examined by specialist specialists and referred to the Department of vaccine prevention. A serological study of the intensity of immunity to vaccine-controlled infections was conducted before and after the course of vaccinations, and an individual vaccination plan was drawn up. The department carried out immunization against chickenpox, pneumococcal and meningococcal infections, revaccination against polio, as well as vaccination against hepatitis A. In the future, a vaccination plan was drawn up for preventive vaccinations at the place of residence, and immunization of the entourage was recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueПедиатрическая фармакологияSame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207