MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412615299 · doi:10.30827/rl.v0i36.32935

¿Para quién es ornamental el corazón? Cursilerías y otros desbordamientos sentimentales en la poesía de Berta García Faet

2025· article· es· W4412615299 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Juan Pedro Sánchez López

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Letral · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad Nacional de La PlataYork University
KeywordsHumanitiesGarciaArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo pretende participar de una conversación abierta sobre el uso poético y político de la cursilería en la poesía de Berta García Faet. Dividido en dos partes, primero, ofrece una introducción contextual a la obra de la autora y, segundo, presenta un repaso histórico y teórico del concepto de lo cursi con el fin de elaborar una contracrítica a otro artículo publicado recientemente, argumentando que la categoría de lo cursi es central para comprender su poesía. El uso consciente y político de estereotipos, normas de género y clichés asociados a la feminidad resulta crucial, y la sugerencia de otros términos para abordar estas poéticas (como la ligereza) se revela insuficiente o desacertada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista LetralSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207