MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of tree shelters on the survival and growth of deciduous tree species 6 years after afforestation

2025· article· en· W4412617434 on OpenAlexaff
Krasimira Petkova, Nasko Iliev, Martin Borisov, Martin Sattler

Bibliographic record

VenueSilva Balcanica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsTerrafix Geosynthetics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAfforestationDeciduousTree (set theory)ForestryAgroforestryGeographyBiologyEcologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of tree shelters on the survival and growth in height and diameter of three tree species: common beech ( Fagus sylvatica L.), sycamore ( Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and sessile oak ( Quercus petraea Matt. (Liebl.)), was studied. The study was conducted in two experimental plantations established in the spring of 2018 at the Training and Experimental Forest Range Petrohan ((North-Western Bulgaria). Four experimental variants with tree shelters – Tubex Ventex Classic, Tubex Ventex Clear, Layflat Shelterguard, Layflat Treeguard and a control one (without tree shelters) were used. Twenty to twenty-seven seedlings in three replications of each variant and tree species were planted. The experimental plantation 1 was established on an east-facing flat terrain at an altitude of 600 m. The soil is Grey Luvisol mixture of sandy and clay, slightly stony, and very deep. The site class is medium rich to rich. The experimental plantation 2 is located in a high-density game area. The area is a meadow, facing north, with an 8o slope and altitude of 850 m. The soil is Dystric-Eutric Cambisol, a mixture of sandy and clay, slightly stony and deep. The site class is medium rich to rich. In the autumn of the 6-th year after the establishment of the plantations, survival was assessed and the height and root collar diameter of all seedlings from each variant and replication were measured. Survival is relatively high in the tree shelter variants, while it is significantly lower in the control variant. Height growth is better in the tree shelter variants, especially in the variants with ventilated tree shelters A and B, in which the highest percentage of seedlings with a height greater than that of the tree shelters was also found. The tree shelter variants have a larger root collar diameter, but in some cases the difference with the control (without tree shelters) is not statistically significant. For future afforestation, the ventilated tree shelters Tubex Ventex Classic and Tubex Ventex Clear could be recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSilva BalcanicaSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207