MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412618070 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/adf37d

Compo-code 3D/4D printing of shape-memory meta-composites for supreme precision, speed, recovery, and energy dissipation

2025· article· en· W4412618070 on OpenAlexaff
Omid Kordi, M Yusefi Passandi, Amir Hossein Behravesh, Mahdi Bodaghi

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilRoyal Academy of Engineering
KeywordsDissipationComposite materialEnergy (signal processing)Materials scienceCode (set theory)Structural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study introduces a groundbreaking methodology for 3D/4D printing of continuous fiber-reinforced meta-composites, achieving unprecedented precision and performance through the development of custom G-code modifier software. This novel software, which automatically detects part edges and locally reduces printing speed, creates a modified G-code so-called compo-code for printing composites. This represents a breakthrough in composite additive manufacturing by significantly enhancing fiber alignment, printing quality, and reducing print time. These innovations enable the fabrication of high-performance lattice composites with optimized energy absorption, dissipation, and shape recovery capabilities. This research examines hexagonal and re-entrant meta-composites reinforced with continuous glass fibers (0, 20, 40 wt%) to evaluate their thermo-mechanical behaviors. Results demonstrate that meta-composites printed with the compo-code achieve approximately remarkable tensile (2700 N), bending (200 N), and compressive (400 N) forces compared to conventional methods. Comparing meta-composites with non-reinforced meta-structures, the tensile, bending, and compression strengths rise by 1000%, 1000%, and 450%, respectively. Hexagonal patterns exhibit superior tensile and bending strength, while re-entrant patterns, with their auxetic behavior, achieve supreme compressive performance and demonstrate a stable quasi-constant force plateau, critical for efficient energy absorption and dissipation. Hexagonal meta-composites with 40 wt% fibers deliver the highest energy dissipation and absorption (0.51 J and 0.10 J). Additionally, shape recovery tests under compression and bending reveal recovery ratios of 100% for non-reinforced and ∼95% for reinforced samples. By integrating advanced software, meta-material design, and continuous fiber reinforcement, this study provides a transformative framework for high-precision manufacturing of next-generation meta-composites, paving the way for advanced applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Materials and StructuresSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207