Bilan du Groupe de travail no 4. Dimensions historique, culturelle et langagière dans l’enseignement des mathématiques responsables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
« Le travail du GT4 portait sur les dimensions historique, culturelle et langagière dans l’enseignement des mathématiques. Le groupe est issu d’une fusion de deux groupes tenus pendant les colloques de l’EMF du passé. Huit personnes se sont réunies afin de discuter de trois textes. Ont été soumis d’autres textes, mais les auteur.es n’étaient pas en mesure de venir. Les membres du groupe ont représenté quatre pays : Le Mali : Hawa Coulibaly, Ousmane Alpha. Le Sénégal : Elhadj Dia, Lam Ndiaye. Le Canada : Richard, David. La France : Hombeline Languereau, Anne Cortella. De plus, Jean Jacques Salone de la Maillote a participé à deux séances du groupe. [...] »
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".