MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412623415 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2025.3592539

A Novel High-Efficiency Fully Soft-Switching High Step-Up DC–DC Converter Utilizing an Active Switched Inductor

2025· article· en· W4412623415 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Akhlaghi, Reza Montazerolghaem, Ehsan Adib, Patrick Wheeler

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductorSwitched capacitorElectrical engineeringSwitching frequencyForward converterElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceBoost converterEngineeringVoltageCapacitor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel DC-DC converter for high-step-up applications. The converter combines an active switched inductor (ASI) circuit and a snubber circuit to increase gain and provide soft switching for all semiconductor devices. With the use of a single-core coupled inductor, high voltage gain is achieved. The snubber circuit further contributes to the gain enhancement. The switches turn on under zero current switching (ZCS) conditions, while all diodes operate under ZCS. In addition, the snubber capacitor provides zero voltage switching (ZVS) when the switches turn off. The low voltage stress on the switches enables the use of switches with low on-resistance, which reduces conduction loss. Additionally, the advantage of current sharing leads to a greater reduction in switch conduction loss. The theoretical analysis of the proposed converter is explained in detail. Furthermore, a prototype with an input voltage of 40V and an output voltage of 400V is implemented to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207