Whole-Brain Cell-Cell Interaction Axes Explaining Tissue Vulnerability Across the Neurodegenerative Spectrum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disrupted cell-cell communication represents a fundamental mechanism underlying neurodegeneration, yet how specific intercellular signaling patterns relate to regional brain vulnerability remains poorly understood. Here, we map whole-brain intercellular interaction networks and their spatial correspondence with tissue damage across 13 neurodegenerative conditions, including early– and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, presenilin-1 mutations, clinical and pathological subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. By integrating multiregional single-nucleus and bulk RNA-seq data with curated cell-cell interaction databases and structural MRI, we reconstruct over 1,000 whole-brain maps of ligand-receptor interactions and quantify their associations with regional atrophy patterns. Multivariate analysis identifies three dominant axes of intercellular communication that explain regional vulnerability to neurodegeneration. Notably, the first axis involves neuron-astrocyte-microglia interactions, explaining atrophy patterns shared by frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease subtypes. Two complementary axes involving neurons, endothelial cells, and astrocytes explain patterns specific to mutations in PS1 and Parkinson’s disease. Importantly, validation in an independent post-mortem cohort (N = 375) confirms that late-onset Alzheimer’s disease-associated cell-cell interactions predict observed frontal cortex atrophy. These results establish a systematic framework linking local intercellular communication networks to spatial patterns of neurodegeneration, revealing both shared and disease-specific molecular pathways that drive regional brain vulnerability and identifying cellular interaction targets for precision therapeutic interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".