An Assessment of the Maximal Mouth Opening in Indian Children of Udaipur City, Rajasthan, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: This study studies maximal mouth opening (MMO) in Indian children of Udaipur city, Rajasthan, to define the normal range in children without functional masticatory system problems and the link between mouth opening, age, gender, height, and body weight. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study investigated the MMO in Indian children. A total of 352 children participated and were divided into three age categories: Group 1 consisted of children aged 6-8 years, Group II comprised those aged 8.1-10 years, and Group III included children aged 10.1-12 years. Height and weight were recorded. Results: Participants had a mean MMO of 44.02 ± 4.03 mm, with MMO values of 40.99 ± 3.13 mm, 44.82 ± 3.12 mm, and 46.40 ± 3.77 mm for Groups I, II, and III. Boys had a higher mean MMO score than girls, although the difference was not significant. A positive connection between MMO and both height and weight was recorded. Conclusion: There is no difference between boys and girls for either gender. The relationship between height and weight is not only significant but also positively correlated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".